NHTSA to Evaluate AEB System Errors on Certain Cascadias

Eighteen Questionnaires Allege Errors on Some 2017-2022 Freightliner Cascadias

Freightliner Cascadia
A Freightliner Cascadia. (Daimler AG)

[Stay on top of transportation news: .]

The has launched a preliminary evaluation into a series of complaints involving automatic emergency braking system errors on certain trucks.

The announcement comes at a time in which the and NHTSA have launched a proposed rule mandating the use of automatic emergency braking systems on heavy trucks.

NHTSA鈥檚 Office of Defects Investigation has received 18 questionnaires that allege 鈥渆rrors in the automatic emergency braking system鈥 on certain 2017-2022 Freightliner Cascadias.



鈥淒rivers report activation of the AEB without an actual roadway obstacle, also known as a false-positive event,鈥 a NHTSA report said. 鈥淭he reports indicate the subject vehicle will apply the service brakes without warning or input from the driver. The applications range from momentary, partial application with little loss of speed to full application, which brings the vehicle to a complete stop in the travel lane.鈥

Image
Kevin Grove

骋谤辞惫别听

The questionnaires are entered into the agency鈥檚 consumer-complaint database, and forwarded to NHTSA technical staff for evaluation.

Freightliner is a brand of , which is cooperating with NHTSA on the evaluation.

鈥淒aimler Truck North America is fully committed to the development of life-saving technologies such as automatic emergency braking that have the potential to greatly improve roadway safety,鈥 DTNA said through a spokesperson. 鈥淭he company shares the same mission as NHTSA to reduce fatal crashes and serious injuries, and looks forward to continued collaboration with the agency to review AEB technology and the upcoming regulation and test procedures that are being developed for the industry by NHTSA.鈥

The agency said its Vehicle Research and Test Center tested a Freightliner Cascadia AEB-equipped vehicle. 鈥淒uring the steel trench plate scenario, the vehicle initiated hard braking when the plate was detected,鈥 the report said. A steel trench plate is a large metal rectangle used to patch a hole in the roadway.

鈥淚 would say these are a known challenge for collision detection, because they鈥檙e very good at reflecting radar signals,鈥 said Kevin Grove, director of safety and technology policy for , about the plates. 鈥淪ome systems handle it better than others, and it is an issue if it brakes hard enough or long enough. A false alert with little or no braking is a problem for driver trust and acceptance but probably wouldn鈥檛 be a safety concern for NHTSA.鈥

NHTSA declined comment for this story, saying it does not comment on open investigations. However, in its report it noted, 鈥淒TNA stated that the steel trench plate was not representative of real-world driving. This preliminary evaluation has been opened to evaluate the issue and determine whether the alleged defect creates an unreasonable risk to safety.鈥

Want more news? Listen to today's daily briefing above or go here for more info

Top FMCSA officials in April said the agency also plans to introduce rulemaking proposals for heavy vehicle speed limiters, safe integration of automated driving systems and a safety fitness rule to identify unfit motor carriers.

In May, NHTSA announced an NPRM to require AEB systems on passenger cars and light trucks. The proposed rule is expected to dramatically reduce crashes associated with pedestrians and rear-end crashes.

NHTSA projects that the proposed rule, if finalized, would save at least 360 lives a year and reduce injuries by at least 24,000 annually. In addition, the AEB systems would result in reductions in property damage caused by rear-end crashes. Many crashes would be avoided altogether, it added, while others would be less damaging.